Marc-Antoine Brillant, who previously led Viginum, France’s counterintelligence agency focused on foreign digital interference, is stepping down from the public sector to create a private security firm. According to a source close to Brillant, he aims to continue his work "in the service of democracy" while enjoying greater autonomy and the ability to combat information manipulation alongside the state. His new agency, which will have Havas Group as a shareholder, plans to help businesses, non-governmental organizations, and media outlets defend against tactics designed to distort public perception. Brillant’s team describes such manipulation as an "existential threat to our societies." Viginum, established in 2021 as part of the Secretariat General for Defense and National Security, was created to bolster France’s defenses against foreign influence, particularly through digital means. Its mission includes identifying and countering disinformation campaigns that could undermine national security or political stability. The agency was formed in response to growing concerns about the role of foreign actors in shaping public opinion and influencing political processes. Brillant’s departure comes amid ongoing investigations into potential Russian disinformation efforts targeting high-profile French officials, including former Prime Minister Edouard Philippe and current Minister Gabriel Attal. These concerns highlight the increasing complexity of digital threats and the need for both public and private sectors to collaborate in safeguarding democratic processes. Brillant’s transition to the private sector may signal a shift in how such challenges are addressed, with more emphasis on private-sector partnerships and flexible strategies. While the French government continues to lead efforts to counter foreign interference, Brillant’s new agency represents a growing trend of former public officials leveraging their expertise in the private sector. His move could provide additional resources and innovative approaches to the fight against information manipulation, complementing existing state efforts. However, it also raises questions about the balance between public oversight and private initiative in protecting democratic institutions.