Brian Druker, M.D., a respected physician and researcher in precision medicine at the Knight Cancer Institute at Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU), recently discovered that a fake Facebook account was using his name to promote unproven cancer treatments involving ivermectin, a drug typically used for parasitic infections. A similar account had previously appeared on the social media platform X. Druker expressed concern over the misuse of his identity and the risk it poses to public trust in medical professionals. In an age where misinformation spreads rapidly online, such incidents highlight the growing challenge of separating accurate health information from false claims. Cliff Coleman, M.D., M.P.H., a primary care physician and health literacy expert at OHSU, notes that patients often struggle to find reliable health information online. He points out that AI chatbots and other digital tools can offer quick, confident responses that may seem trustworthy but are not always accurate. Coleman emphasizes the importance of maintaining strong, trusting relationships between patients and their doctors, as these human connections can help counter the misleading nature of some online content. Kristin Whitman, M.L.S., head of learning and information services at the OHSU Library, advises people to ask two key questions when evaluating health information: "Why should I trust this information?" and "What happens if it's wrong?" She recommends a strategy called "lateral reading," which involves checking other sources to confirm or challenge what is found online. Whitman acknowledges that people may be drawn to hopeful or comforting information, which can sometimes lead to misinformation. She encourages individuals to critically assess the credibility of the sources they rely on. Fabrice Jotterand, Ph.D., director of the OHSU Center for Ethics in Health Care, calls for humility and open dialogue in discussions about health and science. He believes that healthcare professionals and scientists should engage with people who have different views, aiming to build understanding and work toward shared goals. In a time of increasing polarization, Jotterand argues that avoiding debate is not the solution—rather, it's about fostering respectful conversations that promote progress. Despite his leadership role at OHSU, Druker continues to see patients and listens to their concerns, including questions about vaccines and ivermectin. He stresses the importance of understanding where patients get their information and addressing their needs to achieve the best possible health outcomes. Whitman also promotes the SIFT framework for evaluating online information: Stop to consider emotions and prior knowledge, Investigate the source’s credibility and recency, Find trusted coverage through other sources, and Trace the claim back to its original source. She notes that librarians are available to help individuals navigate the complex world of online information and identify misinformation.