An anonymous letter, allegedly written by a medical student, has been making the rounds on social media since the start of summer. The letter claims that topics and grading grids for the oral exams of the medical internship competition were available to some students before the exams took place, possibly giving them an unfair advantage. This has raised concerns about the fairness of the competition and the integrity of the process. The medical internship competition is a crucial step for medical students, as it determines their placement in hospitals for their final year of training. The oral exams are a key component of this process, testing students' knowledge and readiness for real-world medical practice. If the allegations are true, it could undermine the entire selection process and affect the future careers of those involved. Students across various universities have responded to the rumors with a range of emotions. Many feel anxious about the possibility that their efforts may have been overshadowed by those who had access to the materials beforehand. Others are angry, believing that the system is not as fair as it should be. Some have expressed frustration with the lack of clear information and the difficulty in proving or disproving the claims. The organizers of the competition have denied the allegations, stating that all exams were conducted under strict conditions to prevent any form of cheating. They have emphasized their commitment to transparency and fairness. However, the controversy has sparked broader discussions about the need for greater oversight and clearer procedures in high-stakes academic evaluations.