Olympe de Gouges, a French writer and activist of the late 18th century, is remembered today as a pioneer for women's rights. She was executed by guillotine in 1793 during the French Revolution for her political views and writings, which challenged the status quo of the time. In recent years, she has become a symbol for feminists, often carried in protests as a banner representing the fight for gender equality. Recently, the National Rally, a French political party with conservative and nationalist views, proposed that Olympe de Gouges be honored by being enshrined in the Pantheon, a prestigious mausoleum in Paris reserved for notable French figures. The Pantheon is typically associated with individuals who have made significant contributions to French history, culture, or science, and being interred there is considered a great honor. Historian Cécile Berly, who recently authored a book examining the life and legacy of Olympe de Gouges, has expressed concern over the National Rally’s proposal. Berly argues that while de Gouges was indeed an important Enlightenment thinker and advocate for women's rights, her inclusion in the Pantheon should be based on a thorough and respectful evaluation of her contributions rather than political symbolism. She believes the proposal might oversimplify her complex legacy. Berly’s response highlights the broader debate over how historical figures are remembered and honored. While the proposal to recognize Olympe de Gouges might seem progressive on the surface, it raises questions about who gets to decide historical legacy and whether political motives might overshadow the true significance of her work. This discussion reflects ongoing conversations about the intersection of history, politics, and social values in modern France.